design requirements manual

LINK 1 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF
LINK 2 ENTER SITE >>> Download PDF

File Name:design requirements manual.pdf
Size: 1717 KB
Type: PDF, ePub, eBook

Category: Book
Uploaded: 20 May 2019, 14:46 PM
Rating: 4.6/5 from 557 votes.


Last checked: 1 Minutes ago!

In order to read or download design requirements manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.

Download Now!

eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version

✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account.

✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use)

✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied.

✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers

design requirements manualPlease enable scripts and reload this page. Please turn on JavaScript and try again. The DRM is the only detailed design requirements and guidance manual of its kind. The information compiled within the 2016 DRM is the result of technical studies that have set numerous national and international standards, lessons learned and ever-advancing architectural and engineering technologies used in the design and construction of NIH facilities. The Division of Technical Resources (DTR) is responsible for maintaining and updating the DRM. DTR has gathered data from these studies as well as from numerous years of specialized experience and an accumulation of lessons-learned. This has led to data-driven decision making and best practices for the design and construction of NIH’s facilities. The results of these studies are incorporated into the 2016 DRM and new information will be added as it becomes available. In order to provide guidance and standards which represent the best practices in facility design, DTR assembled over 200 professionals from industry, academia, and government including designers, architects, engineers, researchers, veterinarians, maintenance staff, biosafety specialists, and others; all with expertise in a variety of disciplines and unique insights into the complicated design, construction, and functional issues involved in building NIH facilities. Numerous drafts of the DRM have been compiled during the revision process and over 3,000 comments evaluated. Through this scrupulous process, the DTR has compiled cutting edge design guidance and standards which will help support the NIH mission for years to come. The NIH Design Requirements Manual aligns the NIH facilities program with the Office of Research Facilities’ (ORF) mission of: “Supporting NIH priorities by providing safe, secure, sound, healthy, and attractive facilities.” Additionally, this manual also aligns ?the ORF with a national imperative to be good stewards of America’s real property assets.

  • design requirements manual, design requirements manual nih, metrolinx design requirements manual, go design requirements manual, nih design requirements manual pdf, airworthiness design requirements manual, nih design requirements manual 2016, nih design requirements manual drm, design submission requirements manual, design specifications and requirements manual, design requirements manual, design requirements manual, design requirements manual, nih design requirements manual 2016, nih design requirements manual drm, nih design requirements manual pdf, usace design submission requirements manual.

The Design Policy and Guidelines are the responsibility of the Division of Technical Resources (DTR).Note on the use of the Desk Guide: The full, unabridged DRM rem ains the guiding document and primary source for policies, requirements, and guidance for all stakeholders and decision makers involved in the planning, construction and operation of NIH facilities. The Desk Guide is intended to be ancillary to the DRM, serving as a navigation aide and providing an overview of DRM contents. The Desk Guide must be used in conjunction with the DRM, and not as a standalone document.If you use special adaptive equipment to access the Web and encounter problems when using our site, please let us know. It would be helpful if you can be as specific as possible when describing the information you seek. Please enable scripts and reload this page. Please turn on JavaScript and try again. If you use special adaptive equipment to access the Web and encounter problems when using our site, please let us know. The website also features a Desk Guide ( a downloadable pdf file ). The Desk Guide must be used in conjunction with the DRM, and not as a standalone document. It is possible to subscribe to emails with information on updates. Please note that we cannot respond unless you supply your email address. Thank you in advance for your help. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Please note that we cannot respond unless you supply your email address. It is also responsible for reviewing and approving its content and organization. DTR pursue, research and test state-of-the-art and innovative technology that may be applicable to biomedical research facilities, and incorporating research results and lessons-learned from the design and construction of NIH’s unique biomedical research facilities into the DRM. The DRM is a dynamic document. Revisions are made as necessary. The entire DRM will be revised on a three year cycle. ORF has conducted studies that are the basis for NIH’s Bio-Environmental Engineering Research Program. These studies have set numerous National and International Standards for Better Indoor Air Quality and Greater Energy Conservation. The following standard setting organizations have adopted the NIH research findings: American National Standard Institutes (ANSI), American Society of Heating and Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), The American Institute of Architects (AIA) Academy of Architecture for Health, and the International Academy on Indoor Air Quality The results of these studies are incorporated in the 2008 DRM and new information will be added as it becomes available. The goal of 'Whole Building' Design is to create a successful high-performance building by applying an integrated design and team approach to the project during the planning and programming phases. Disclaimer. The DRM is the only detailed design requirements and guidance document of its kind.The DRM represents a large body of knowledge gathered from many sources within the NIH including facilities, scientific and veterinary staff from the 27 NIH Institutes and Centers, other Federal agencies such as the CDC and FDA, and numerous experts from the private sector. The 2016 DRM edition constitutes a major restructuring and reorganization, representing the collected contributions of over 200 professionals from industry, academia and government, numerous drafts and over 3,000 peer review comments. In class exercises will be provided to ensure that the attendees get a clear idea about the design criteria. The course will benefit Engineers, Architects and Bio-safety professionals involved in the design, construction and operation of these specialized research facilities. She is a registered Professional Engineer and a LEED Accredited Professional. Prior to joining NIH Alamelu worked in the private sector where she was responsible for electrical engineering designs of various types of facilities. He is a licensed Professional Engineer, LEED Accredited Professional and a Certified Energy Manager. Prior to joining NIH Scott worked in the private sector where he was responsible for mechanical engineering designs of various types of facilities. Steven is a registered architect, professional engineer and LEED accredited professional. Prior to joining NIH Steve was a Principal with a leading international architectural firm, and planned and designed science and education facilities for major universities and institutions in the US and around the world. Send us your email to join our mailing list. Please enable scripts and reload this page. There will be site specific situations where the design will depart from these practices as it is not possible nor is it the intention of the City to anticipate every situation.In the upper right corner you can click to download the entire document as a.pdf Note: These are large files All Rights Reserved. Part 1 and associated. Appendices contains requirements which are common to all provincial building projects. Part 2 and associated Appendices contain supporting information for Part 1 Updated: 2020-09-17. Alphatec assisted NIH in the coordination of partnering efforts among NIH Office of Research Facilities, NIH Division of Policy and Program Assessment, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, and the selected representatives from the sector. Written in 1996, it underwent a major revision in 2016, and there have been three more recent up,tes. NIH subject matter experts will provide an overview of contents, organization and use of the DRM, focusing on requirements and applications for biocontainment facilities, including BSL-3. This class will combine presentations with interactive exercises, and will benefit professionals involved in the design, construction and operation of these specialized research facilities. Colorado Springs, CO 80901 Three of the manuals are published together in one volume. They are the Subdivision Policy Manual, the Paving Design Criteria Manual, and the Traffic Criteria Manual. The others are separate publications. Together, the Engineering Criteria Manual establishes the engineering requirements, standards, policies, and regulations of the City Engineer. All public infrastructure and development activity shall conform to the Engineering Criteria Manual. This manual does not constitute a complete list of design criteria, but is to be used as a guide that will provide conformity to the design and plan review process. These Standards are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment nor any applicable standards of practice, permits, laws, or rules and regulations enforced by local, state, or federal guidelines. Designers should consider the applicability of the contents of this document to specific projects and, based on the characteristics and requirements of the projects, make adjustments accordingly. Deviations from these Standards, and special or unique design situations should be thoroughly addressed in writing to the Utilities Engineer for acceptance and approval during the plan review process. A Notification of Receipt of Plans letter will be issued listing your project data and review team. All plan sets submitted to CBU should be routed to the Engineering Utilities Technician for check in and distribution. Please complete the Plan Review Application and include it with your initial submittal. Walk-in drop off is available during normal business hours: M-F 8:00am - 5:00pm. CBU aims to maintain a standard review timeline of 2-4 weeks to allow for all parties to have adequate time to review their portion of the project. This timeline will not be adjusted to accommodate requests for a full review to be expedited. Immediate reviews of a minor revision for correctness are at the discretion of the Project Reviewer. CBU reserves the right to refuse further review of items outlined in previous review letters, unless otherwise addressed. Continued submittal of unrevised plans by the engineer, consultant, or developer, may result in lengthy delays of the review process and potentially affect project timelines. Check list is also available on our website. Construction may not begin without final acceptance and approval of the plans. After one year has elapsed, resubmittal of plans will be required. This may be done at any time, even after Final Acceptance and Approval have been given, or during construction. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer shall be identified by symbology as privately owned or as CBU owned at the time the plans are submitted for review. Without these locations, further plan submittals will not be reviewed. All sanitary, storm, and water mains to be taken over by CBU will require submittal of both plan and profile drawings for review. Said drawings shall show all crossings of all utilities and any utility, tree, or structure within a minimum of fifteen feet of the proposed main. The service line for firelines and master metered lines should be designated as private. Any exceptions must be indicated with symbology on the plans, addressed by letter, and approved in writing by the Utilities Engineer. Ownership of all CBU-designated mains will take effect after the final walk-through is completed, verification that all easements are recorded, and final acceptance is given. A CBU inspector must have notice so work can be inspected, documented, and a proper as-built made. When a contractor works on weekends, a CBU-designated holiday, or beyond normal CBU work hours, the contractor will pay for the inspector’s For work hours and holiday information, please contact CBU’s Engineering Department at (812)349-3660. Instead, mechanical restraints shall be used in accordance with Section of the CBU Construction Specifications. If this project includes extension of a water main, please submit the completed IDEM form, “Notice of Intent to Construct a Water Main Extension”, to our office for review and signature.Please see Sections 18.14 through 18.15 of the CBU Rules, Regulations and Standards of Service to determine eligibility. If the developer determines that his project is eligible and he wishes to pursue this matter, he must contact the Utilities Department after the mains have been installed and provide the necessary information in the proper format. Contact the Project Coordinator - New Services at 812-349-3689 for additional information. System pressure and flow data used for design must be adjusted for low tank level. If you require such data, please call the New Services Coordinator at (812)349-3689. In such case, the 2-inch pipe shall be SDR-21 (PR200), and the 4-inch pipe may be either SDR-21 (PR200) or C900 (DR-14). Splices are to be made with an approved connector, and are to be suitably protected against corrosion. The wire is to be brought to the surface at least every 500 feet to a valve box. This increase in cost will be determined as follows. The cost of pipe and appurtenances will be determined for the proposed line and for the line required by the Utility. The Utility will pay this difference in cost plus twenty percent (20). In no case will the cost of the proposed line be less than the cost to install a 6 inch water line or an 8 inch sewer line.” Contact the Project Coordinator - New Services at 812-349-3689 for additional information. Mains providing flow for fire suppression systems are referred to as “Fire Lines,” and are to remain private. See CBU Construction Specification Installation of Fire Lines, for requirements. Such Fire Lines must be designed in consideration of suppression system demand, as well as, CBU water system pressure and flow, for that area. The valve on the DCDA will be used to hydrostatically pressure test against. Please call the Project Coordinator - New Services at (812) 349-3689 for further information. Please contact Bloomington Fire Inspection Officer (cell: 812-360-3520 or office: 812-349-3889) for placement of post indicator valve (PIV) and Storz type fire department connection (FDC). If there is going to be a fire suppression system, the designer for that system needs to contact us separately. The radio read unit must be obtained through CBU. Contact the New Services Coordinator at (812) 349-3689 for additional details regarding the radio read device and associated fees. Fee information is also available on our website. We require “others” to mount the Touchpad on the outside of the wall, high enough to be out of reach from tamper, but low enough to be accessible with a ladder. The device is obtained from CBU; refer to fee chart. CBU will make the wiring connections on each end and attach the cover when we come to program the device. The backflow devices may be able to be ordered with the piping for the meter but without the meter in place. An approved backflow prevention assembly is required on all customer service lines if the building will house a designated cross connection hazard as specified by 327 IAC 8-10-4 or as determined by CBU. Results are to be submitted to CBU via Contact the Environmental Program Coordinator at (812)349-3948 with any questions. This can be done via a numbered Plan Note. Additional Program details, Informational Brochures, Standard Details, Approved Devices, Installation, Inspection, and Testing Requirements, and submission of the testing reports are available under the Backflow Prevention section of our website. For further information, contact the City Legal Department (812-349-3427). Submit a copy of the recorded Waiver of Protest to Annexation document to the Project Coordinator - New Services at CBU. The appropriate form(s) are available on our website. Please call the Project Coordinator - New Services at (812)349-3689 for information on taps and fees. Please provide an accurate fixture count for each building. At your request, information on fees will also be provided (812-349-3689). Please call the Project Coordinator - New Services at (812)349-3689 for information on applications for service, and fee quotes. Fee information is available on our website. If your plans include sanitary sewer, please provide us with a copy of your completed IDEM application form.Transition from C900 to SDR-35 pipe shall be made by use of a HARCO C900 to SDR-35 Adapter. Wyes for DIP shall be HARCO DIP to SDR-35 Adapter Wyes. Pipe shall be connected to the manhole by either a flexible boot KOR-N-SEAL 1 or 2 flexible connector or approved equal. Invert of the connection shall be no more than one foot higher than invert out for this structure. Table and trough shall be modified as necessary to direct the flow from the new pipe. This increase in cost will be determined as follows. In no case will the cost of the proposed line be less than the cost to install a 6 inch water line or an 8 inch sewer line.” Contact the Project Coordinator - New Services at 812-349-3689 for additional information. Wastewater from 3-bay sinks, pre-rinse sinks, mop sinks, hand sinks, and floor drains shall be discharged into the grease interceptor. Commercial dishwashers shall not be plumbed to the grease interceptor. The installation of new or the replacement of existing garbage disposal units in Food Service Establishments is prohibited. For more information about grease interceptor requirements or to seek approval for a proposed interceptor installation, please contact the Pretreatment Program Inspector at (812) Sample diagrams are available on our website under the Pretreatment Program section. Include the fixture trap arm size and show the points of connection from the fixture to the proper waste line. This can be done via a numbered Plan Note. Any proposed devices must be rated at 100 GPM minimum. No approvals will be granted on new installations. Stormwater structures shall be designed for the 10-year storm without surcharging and checked to insure that structures are protected from flooding during the 100-year storm. Projects where the entire drainage basin is greater than 50 acres must use a rainfall to runoff analysis and develop a hydrograph to determine the peak discharge.We suggest omitting the storm sewer structure data table to avoid confusion. Include all applicable data: structure type, casting type, length, slope, inverts, top of casting, pipe material, stationing, utility crossings, proposed grade line, and existing grade line on the profiles. The manual is to include: This may be in the form of a sentence or chart (see example below). For City-owned Rule 5 projects, please copy me when you send the SWPPP to IDEM and the Monroe County SWCD for their review. This will give me the project information I need to complete the review. The payment is ultimately the responsibility of the Project Site Owner. Payments can be made by cash, check, or credit card. Please address checks to 'City of Bloomington Utilities,' and deliver (in-person or mail) to 600 E Miller Drive, Bloomington, IN 47401. This may be in the form of a Blanket Easement that covers all of the parcel(s) on which the facilities are located, or specific easements over and along those facilities. This shall include any facilities to be built on said parcel(s) in the future that extend beyond the initial phase of the development. The easements must be signed, recorded, and submitted to CBU before construction of said facilities commences.Please incorporate a copy of the Landscaping Plan into the plan set showing the existing and proposed utilities, as well as, existing and proposed easements. Please be sure to review your proposed utilities with the proposed easements.Bloomington IN 47404. Infectious disease research involving highly pathogenic and primarily aerosol transmissible agents (i.e., Risk Group 3 agents) has the potential to present significant risk to individuals, the community, and the environment. The ability to safely conduct these research activities is largely dependent upon the highly engineered Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) laboratory, the highest-level containment facilities currently operated by the UC. The primary objective of these laboratories is to provide the best possible physical containment of Risk Group 3 agents. Hence, the design and engineering of these laboratories must be maintained at the highest attainable standards. The HCLOC has assembled and approved these design standards to serve as the foundation of BSL-3 laboratory design and construction and to support the application of consistent standards within UC. The UC BSL-3 Laboratory Design Standards provide the mandatory minimum design criteria for Biosafety Level 3 laboratories in the UC system. There is the historical aspect: America invented the concept of nationally owned and operated parks in 1872, when Ulysses S. Grant signed Yellowstone National Park into existence. But there is more to Stegner’s sentiment than just the invention of the parks. The rest of the quote goes on to say that the parks are “Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst.” It’s full of splendor and glory, as well as greed and exploitation. For every person who loves one of the parks like it’s their own home, there is another who resents the federal government for owning it. Even before Yellowstone became the first national park, park history was fraught with tension. Tension between preservation and use, between indigenous people and white explorers, between local rights and federal oversight, between wild freedom and human control, between park purists and park recreationists, and between commercial exploitation and historic value. Compelling creative materials that celebrated the land — including books, paintings, performances, and advertisements — have marked developments and milestones. These items have brought the rich landscapes and their scientific and historical significance to life. If those European buildings were testaments to the greatness of royalty and intellect, America’s parks were testaments to the country’s scale and spirit of independence. Europe’s man-made creations embodied exclusion and wealth, whereas our natural landscapes embodied democracy and wonderment. And throughout the 136-year history of what we now call the park system, the art and storytelling that happened on its land or that took the parks as its subject matter has played a critical role in the park system’s perpetuation. John Muir’s poetic writings enraptured readers and inspired early support of the parks. National railroad advertisements and brochures enticed turn-of-the-century travelers to “see America first” (rather than going to Europe for vacations). And Marian Anderson’s 1939 performance in front of the Lincoln Memorial demonstrated the American ideal of freedom — of both people and individual expression — at a time when the nation and world were facing deep crises. And through their impact, the legacy of the parks has been fulfilled. The majestic spaces were (and continue to be) set aside for preservation, saved from the various industries and activities that may have ruined them: logging, hunting, water management, and more. They are for the people and yet were created to be protected from people. Funded in part by Congress and in part by the railroads, the group of 32 men — including several surveyists, a photographer, painter Thomas Moran, and a few of Hayden’s academic peers and students — spent about four months in the region. Most notably, the group introduced a scientific approach to land exploration and documented the scenes for people, most of whom had never seen anything like it. Moran painted some of the first portraits of the region. These paintings communicated scenes that few people had previously seen. In a strategic move, Hayden included Moran’s breathtaking paintings in the final report to Congress. This combination of science and artistry was what Congress needed for inspiration to start the parks. In many ways, the park system happened accidentally. There was no grand plan or unified vision, so operationalizing our “best idea” also happened organically. As parks were created, they weren’t always funded or documented or even staffed. From 1891 to 1913, the Army alone patrolled and protected the land but had no real authority. You have to watch only one episode of Ken Burns’ and Dayton Duncan’s six-episode documentary The National Parks: America’s Best Idea (itself a contemporary telling of the National Park Service story) to learn about the staggering number of people and groups that fought the creation of parks, monuments, and sites from all sides. But throughout, there have also been supporters, sometimes unlikely, sometimes at odds among themselves, but always with the goal of preserving the land and spirit of the parks and often with the aid of a pen, printing press, or story. Although John Muir faced many obstacles and heartbreaks during his fight for park protection, the Antiquities Act led to hundreds of thousands of miles of land being protected. Muir’s words, full of compassion and clarity, touched millions of souls, not just on paper but also in the impact they had on the history of the parks. The 1916 book’s orchestrator, Stephen Mather, was one of the park system’s most prominent protagonists and the first director of the National Park Service. Whether the vision for uniting the national parks, monuments, and historic sites (previously all controlled by a handful of distinct government divisions) under a single department can be fully credited to Mather is not certain, but it was almost surely his public relations strategies that made the National Park Service a reality. Sensing that broad public support for the parks would encourage government support of Wilson’s proposition, he created the lavish book to share the vistas with the large majority of the population who had never seen them firsthand. With significant funding from the collection of railroad companies servicing the West, the author Robert Sterling Yard, an accomplished journalist, penned awesome descriptions of the parks and persuasive claims about the importance of the parks to national identity. The book was well received (and reprinted), and the National Park Service was approved. It was not the first or last time pictures and words propelled America’s best idea into its next phase. As the document goes on to say, “and keep them as nearly in their natural state as this can be done in view of the fact that access to them must be provided in order that they may be used and enjoyed.” As this document makes clear, the intention and purpose of the parks is to both preserve the parks as-is and accommodate current-day visitors and their needs. The increasing ability for people to leave the city and visit nature was spurred by both a promising economy and the greater availability of cars. In 1920, four years after Mather became the first director of the National Park Service, visitors exceeded one million, and by just five years later, that number had doubled. Notably, and differently than in previous decades, almost all visitors arrived in cars. This ushered in the long tradition of parks creating park-specific windshield stickers that have served as proud badges throughout the 20th century. A young Ansel Adams partnered with the Sierra Club to advocate for Kings Canyon National Park, an area John Muir once said rivaled Yosemite. Using photographs of the area, the book Sierra Nevada: The John Muir Trail captured America’s deepest canyon in a way that only Adams could, with images at once striking and serene. The book was given to Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes and President Franklin Roosevelt, and inspired their support. Shortly thereafter, Kings Canyon National Park was created. Between 1940 and 1960, attendance grew by 375 percent, escalating from 17 million to 79 million. They are part pragmatic, part aspirational. They are brochures for the heart and soul of each destination: They tell the story of a place, and they mirror that place. And within the landscape of exploration, a core tenet of Americanism, perhaps there is nothing more symbolic than a used map, folded and refolded along weathered creases. Learning to read maps and playing the role of navigator on a road trip is a rite of passage for many kids whose families hit the roads for summer vacation. As the park system expanded and the number of visitors grew, the maps and brochures became stand-ins in the absence of these guides. As visitors began more independent excursions throughout the parks in the 1920s (before that, visitors were often led by guides) and public roads snaked through more parks, maps and brochures became a necessity. They delineated where and how to use the park. Government mapping, frequently beginning in the discovery and exploration phase, provided an increased understanding of the unique features of an area, such as the locations of bodies of land and water, topographic and geological attributes, and the presence of historic and cultural artifacts.